Sunday, June 9, 2013

SuperC-Touch 第二件先進內嵌式觸控結構專利開使銷售

SuperC-Touch 第二件先進內嵌式觸控結構專利開使銷售
台灣證書號 M441878 (新型)
名稱: 內嵌式觸控顯示面板結構
售價: 1,500,000. USD
說明:
    TFT LCD上層的彩色濾光玻璃上的BM層做成導體,,可用複合結構或直接使用金屬做成的BM,將其圖案化做成點自電容的結構,不用增加光罩就可完成,與SuperC-Touch的前一篇M445719專利,目的相同但做法不同。
 使用點自電容結構,將金屬線作成Touch Sensor隱藏在 LCD color filterBM下面,應該不外乎上述的兩種方法,由於沒有使用ITO所以光學特性最好,良率高,容易重工 (Rework) 因此貼合問題最小,成本最低
用在4.3”的手機可以Cost down 3~10美元
用在 7”的平板可以Cost down 5~10美元
用在10”的平板可以Cost down 10~15美元
用在13”的觸控面板 Cost down 20美元
保守估計以拿下10%的市場佔有率,就可以創造超過30(美元/)利潤空間。
    本案另外還有申請美國US,大陸CN,韓國KR,歐盟EU,地區的發明專利,未來獲證後會以美國(US) 3M USD,大陸(CN)  1.5M USD,韓國 (KR) 1.5M USD,歐盟(EU)  1.5M USD的金額來銷售,歡迎預約訂購。
    在彩色濾光玻璃的BM層下方看不見的區域用金屬線來做觸控Sensor,在觸控結構上可分為兩大類,使用互電容技術如Apple Us 8,243,027 Samsung TW201217863的專利申請都有提到將LCDVcom層圖案化做為Tx,將金屬線作成Touch Sensor隱藏在 LCD color filterBM下面當RxAppleSamsung說的方法完成相同,看來沒有太多的迴避設計的空間,SuperC-Touch 採用點自電容的結構,將金屬線作成Touch Sensor隱藏在 LCD color filterBM下面,所能想出的方法也不外乎目前提出的兩個專利,看來也沒太多的迴避設計的空間,所以重要性不比AppleSamsung的專利提案低。
   SuperC-Touch首開觸控專利訂價買賣的商業模式,得到許多先進的熱情鼓勵與回應,並提出問題與建議,經過一番整理與歸納後提供給大家做參考。
1.      是否有配合的IC厂家和TP制造厂家? 是否有样品?
  Ans:目前還沒有觸控IC廠商來洽詢授權,也還沒有樣品。
2.      請問貴專利可實施的可能性
Ans:AppleSamsung的專利申請內容來看,兩大主力廠商都認同將金屬Sensor做在BM的下面是確實可行。
3.      可否使用在IPS,FFS的面板
Ans:與台灣的面板廠商討論後認為BM下的金屬線會對顯示造成影響,我的看法是要實驗過後才能確定,不然只是推論。
4.      color filter層的sensor線要如何接到觸控IC
Ans:可參考友達的I380072號專利有很詳細的說明。
5.      做在BM的下方Sensor Vcom層會非常接近,而金屬線的面積很小,對觸控IC的挑戰很大,有那家的觸控IC可以使用
Ans:到目前為止還看不出有那家的觸控IC可以使用,不過SuperC-Touch已完成實驗,證明用自行開發的微擾共振的觸控IC技術確實可行。
6.      請問貴司有申請新型技術報告書嗎?
Ans: 請參考下列的檔案
7.      該件專利佈局狀況?
Ans: M445719 TW獲證,CNUSKR申請中
    M441878 TW獲證,CNUSKREU申請中
8.      為何未申請發明專利呢?
Ans:因為新型專利比發明專利來的有用,相信許多人對新型專利與發明專利之間的差別,觀念上很模糊,利用此機會為大家做個介紹。
a.       權利時間不同,新型10年,發明20年,由申請日起算,權利開始的時間由核准日期開始,新型審查時間通常少於6個月,發明的審查通常大於3年,在審查時間的很難提供專利保障,以現在的產品生命期來看,新型專利要比發明專利在時效性上要有用的多,有許多的發明專利審了7~8年才拿到,產品有可能在市場上都下架了。
b.      審查的內容不同,新型只審查是否有前案,不審新穎性與進步性,發明要審查是否有前案加上新穎性與進步性,三者都符合才會核准,所以要主張專利無效時,新型專利比發明專利不易被推翻,原因為新型只有找到前案才能推翻,發明除了找到前案外還可用其不俱有新穎性與進步性來推翻。
c.       大部份的項目可以申請發明專利,新型專利則有相當限制。
d.      權利的使用上兩者都相同,沒有好壞強弱之分。
如果各位先進還有更進一步的問題需要討論歡迎將問題mail給我,SuperC-Touch將竭盡所能為大家提供答案,謝謝。
SuperC-Touch 李祥宇敬上

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Advance in cell touch structure patents are available on IP market for selling

This is the formal notice that SuperC Touch is starting to seek the opportunity to cooperate with the industry partners by selling SuperC Touch’s patents to industry. The details are explained in below.

Patent for sale: Advanced In Cell Touch Structure

Taiwan Patent number: M445719 (New Type)
Patent name: Incell Touch panel structure with metal sensor layer
Price: US 1,000,000
Description: Applying the metal line as sensor below  the BM layer of LCD to perform touch function; there is no ITO and the optical characteristics and yield is very good. Rework is easy and no lamination issue.

Cost reduction estimation for 4.3” mobile phone is around 3 to 10 USD
Cost reduction estimation for 7” tablet is around 5 to 10 USD
Cost reduction estimation for 10” tablet is around 10 to 15 USD
Cost reduction estimation for 13” notebook PC is around 20 USD

Estimation saving based on 10% market share is around 3 billion USD per year.

The US version, China and Korea version of the patents will be sold at the price of 2 million, 1.5 million and 1.5 million respectively in the future.

Incell technology is first released by Apple, however the yield rate is low and the cost is high. One issue is the controller IC, especially for in Cell. In fact, it is easy to add touch feature inside LCD. As the patent suggests, by adding one mask on the color filter glass, the increased cost is minimal and panel production is not difficult.  Because the sensor is very close to LCD VCOM layer which made the measurement very difficult, that is the challenge.  Today’s Controller IC cannot manage this challenge and so no LCD supplier is adapting this technology for touch.  

However SuperC Touch develops the new technology to resolve the challenge and provide the possibility of high yield production.

Current in cell touch patent are owned by Apple, LGD, Samsung and SuperC Touch; there are very few patents that are available in the market. This is a great chance to own one of the most important patents with a minimal expense.

  
To own a patent has two benefits, first one is to utilize the technology for product development to increase competitiveness; the 2nd is to limit competitor technology strength development; or both.

SuperC Touch will release more patens and  cooperate with both panel supplier as well as IC controller supplier. SuperC Touch wishes to work with the partners and provide better opportunity for win-win relationship. Please support SuperC Touch and give your comments and feedback to us. Thanks.  

About Super Touch’s patent selling business models; I summarize below Question and answers in below for your information.

1.      What is advanced in cell technology?
Traditional incell technology including resistive, capacitive and optical types, need to increase components and reduce the LCD opening. Power consumption is increased and yield rate is lower. In these 10 years, all the issues can not be resolved. Apple applied a patent in 2007 and got certified. US 8,243,027. The principle is to  pattern the Vcom layer and use metal line as touch sensor. There is no components increased, production yield is not impacted. After that, Samsung and LGD applied similar patents.

2.      What are the patents that are similar to SuperC Touch patents?
Ans:There are some patents that are similar with Super C touch patents; they are Apple Us 8,243,027TW201031961 US2013/0044074US2012/0162584US2012/0162104US2010/0001973
Samsung TW201209477TW201222116TW201217863TW201224884 
LGD TW201227482TW201236127TW201239844TW201243688

3.      How Taiwan New Utility model Patents can protect you?
Ans:The patent is only for Taiwan and for 10 years. Taiwan is an important production base for LCD production. The more patents you have; the more protection you can expect.

4.      What are the differences between GFF, Incell, Oncell and OGS; the comparison of structure, cost, resource, yield, limitation and the other?
Ans:SuperCTouch’s In-cell technology is the simplest way of Incell technology. The yield is highest and resource consumption is the least. Transparency is the highest due to there is no ITO. The challenge of OGS and GFF is the controller IC, there is no controller in the market that can support SuperC Touch, Apple, Samsung and LGS’s panel. SuperCTouch’s IC can support the panel build for SuperC touch technology.
The comparisons are:
SuperC Touch: metal sensor is below BM, Sensor under BM is thin; transparency is good, material cost is lower; need SuperC Touch controller

GFF: transparency is the worst, yield is worse, material cost is lower then OGS, IC is easy to get
OGS is thick; transparency is OK, yield is better than GFF, material cost is high; IC is easy to get
On cell transparency is better, yield is ok, material is fine but controller IC is difficult to get
In cell (apple) is thinner, transparency is good, yield is low, material cost is ok, IC is easy to get
In cell (optical) is thinner, transparency is no good, yield is low, material cost is high, IC is not easy
In cell (micro switch) is thin, transparency is no good, yield is low, material cost is ok; IC is easy to get. 

5. Is there any information on website for SuperC Touch
Ans: please visit my blog

6.      Current SuperC Touch status:
Ans:SuperC Touch has not finished all the patent application. There is no production product yet. For mess production of the inventions we are willing to sell the patents.

7.      SuperC Touch is going to raise fund?
Ans:We are trying to sell the patent to raise the fund. The raising fund is also another option. Both methods are under going now. Once money is raised; SuperC Touch will stop patents selling and start commercialize the products.

8.      What is the difference between current touch technologies with SuperC touch.
Ans:SuperC touch does not measure the capacitance but measures the change process of the capacitance which is the major difference. The technology is leading current technology.

9.      Where can I get complete patent information in English and Chinese
 Ans: Chinese: 
          English:

10.  What’s SuperC Touch’s patent selling business model?
Ans: SuperC Touch’s patent of in-cell structure is open for sell, but on the controller, it is for license only not for sell.

Any more question, please email me. Thanks,


SuperC-Touch Standly lee

Sunday, June 2, 2013

感謝業界先進的熱情回應

    SuperC-Touch首開觸控專利訂價買賣的商業模式,得到許多先進的熱情鼓勵與回應,並提出問題與建議,經過一番整理與歸納後提供給大家做參考。

1.     何謂先進內嵌式觸控
Ans: 傳統的內嵌式觸控包含電阻式,電容式,光學式三種,都必須增加元件,犧牲LCD的開口率,增加耗電,會造成生產良率下降等缺點,10年來都無法突破所以無法成為主流,而內嵌式觸控一直是Apple想要做的觸控技術,所以在2007年提出了 US8,243,027號專利並已獲證,其主要的精神在於以電容感測為主,將LCD內部的V com層圖案化再把LCD內部看不到的區域用金屬線來做為觸控Sensor為主要概念,不新增元件,簡化增加觸控功能所需的製程,提高生產良率為主要訴求,之後samsungLGD都開始跟進申請相關專利。
2.     SuperC-Touch類似的專利有哪些
Ans: 上述 Apple Us 8,243,027TW201031961 US2013/0044074US2012/0162584US2012/0162104US2010/0001973專利,Samsung TW201209477TW201222116TW201217863TW201224884 專利,LGD TW201227482TW201236127TW201239844TW201243688,專利。
3.     台灣新型專利有何保障
Ans:台灣新型專利的權利時限為10年,雖然沒有實審仍有提告的權利,權力有效處所限於台灣,但台灣目前為觸控與LCD 的生產重地,所以台灣專利也是業界必爭之地,所有的專利都有失效的可能,包括Apple申請獲證的專利都有背叛失效的案例,所以最佳的策略為爭取更多的專利作為武器,任何專利都無法保障他人的迴避設計,但是專利的擁有者握有主動權,提告人官司輸了損失少,贏了就豐收,被告者官司贏了都還損失律師費,何況是輸再加上過程中營運的損失。
4.     计于GFF,INCELL ,ONCELL ,OGS的对比(从结构,成本,资源,良率,使用限制,透过率等反应器件的特性
Ans: 感謝對岸好朋友的提問,SuperC-Touch的先進內嵌式觸控結構,已經將in cell簡化到最省的結果,所以在結構上是最簡單,生產最容易,良率最高,成本最低,所耗的資源最少,透光率上因為沒有使用ITO所以遠高於on cellOGSGFF,目前最大的限制是觸控IC,大家可以想像如果觸控面板生產變得越簡單,表示把困難丟給觸控IC來解決,以目前上市的觸控IC技術,應該還沒有可以讓SuperC-TouchApplesamsungLGD的先進式觸控結構面板可以使用的﹑不過SuperC-Touch開發出的微擾共振技術,日後觸控IC量產時可以完全符合先進內嵌式觸控面板的使用。
分別比較如下
Super C- touch 專利為以金屬線sensor疊藏於BM下方
GFF                  結構厚              透光率最差        良率差(成本上升)       材料成本較OGS    IC便宜易取得
OGS                 結構最厚重       透光率次差        良率較GFF好些 材料成本最高             IC便宜易取得
Oncell              結構薄              透光率佳           良率可                      材料成本尚可             IC 困難
Incell (apple)   結構薄              透光率佳           良率極差(成本驟升)    材料成本可                IC容易
Incell(光感)       結構薄              透光率不佳        良率差(成本上升)       材料成本高                IC貴,困難
Incell(微開關)    結構薄              透光率不佳        良率差(成本上升)       材料成本可                IC容易
sensorBM     結構薄              透光率佳           良率最佳                   材料成本最低             IC需使用微擾共振法

5.   有无贵司的介绍
Ans: 歡迎上公司的網頁或我的部落格參觀一下。

6.   superctouch目前的应用情
Ans: SuperC-Touch目前才完成大部分的專利佈局,微擾共振技術也還在實驗室階段,所以還沒有任何量產商品,由於開發出領先業界的最新觸控技術,普遍受到觸控產業的重視,為了要將此重要的觸控IC商品化,需要龐大的資金,所以只好將佈局好的先進內嵌式觸控結構專利拿出來與大家結緣,期望一同來完成此次觸控產業最大的變革。
7.   SuperC-Touch 有募資計畫嗎?
Ans: 募資計畫與專利銷售同時在進行,目的都在籌措量產觸控IC的資金,就看何種方式先達成目標,待目標達成後SuperC-Touch就會停止後續專利的銷售,專心把觸控IC完成,讓in cell成為觸控的主流技術。
8.   SuperC-Touch 微擾共振技術與現有的觸控技術有何不同
Ans: 現有的觸控技術不論是Apple,Synatpics,Cypress,Atmel等廠商都以測量電容為主,SuperC-Touch"微擾共振技術測量的是電荷變化過程而不是結果,所以在基本的原理上與現有觸控技術完全不同,從實驗的結果來看,相當於將SNR比拉開到數百~數千倍的水準,領先現有的技術應該有幾個數量級的差距。
9.   可以提供完整的專利中,英文資料嗎
     英文資料:

10.       SuperC-Touch的專利有提供授權的商業模式嗎
Ans: SuperC-Touch的專利屬於先進內嵌式觸控結構部分只開放賣斷讓與,在 微擾共振的觸控IC生產技術上則考慮開放授權方式,不採用賣斷方式。

如果各位先進還有更進一步的問題需要討論歡迎將問題mail給我,SuperC-Touch將竭盡所能為大家提供答案,謝謝。